UNIQUELY LEGAL https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html ONLY BECAUSE A PERSON HAS LOST A SUCCESSION CERTIFICATE CASE DOES NOT MEAN HE CANNOT FILE ANOTHER CASE TO CLAIM THE SAME MONEY FROM THE PARTY WHO WON, AS SUCCESSION CERTIFICATE DOES NOT DECIDE TITLE TO THE MONEY CLAIM: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT HELD IN “MADHAVI AMMA & ORS. VS KUNJIKUTTI PILLAI” LANDLORD IS ENTITLED TO EVICT A TENANT WHO GIVES POSSESSION OF TENANATED PROPERTY TO A THIRD PARTY: THAT’S WHAT DELHI HIGH COURT HELD IN “KENNETH SOLOMON V. DAN SINGH BAWA” HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF AGAINST UNREASONABLE AND EXCESSIVE DEMAND OF PROPERTY TAX BY MCD ? : THAT WHAT DELHI HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN “K. L. RATHEE V. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI” (PART-II) Contact HOW TO ATTACH PROPERTY OR BANK ACCOUNT OF THE OPPOSITE PARTY AND MAKE IT PAY YOU THE MONEY WHICH IS LEGALLY YOURS: THAT’S WHAT CALCUTTA HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN GOBINDA CHANDRA PAL V/S DWARKA NATH PAL & ORS. WHAT IS ARBITRATION AND CAN A PARTY BE FORCED INTO IT ? : THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT EXPLAINED IN INDO WIND ENERGY LIMITED V/S WESCARE INDIA LIMITED & ANR. (PART-II) IF A TENANT DENIES TO PAY RENT TO THE LANDLORD, CAUSING LANDLORD TO FILE A CASE, THEN THE LANLORD IS NOT ONLY ENTITLED TO GET THE RENT TILL THE DATE OF FILING OF THE CASE BUT RENT SHOULD BE PAID TO HIM FOR EVERY FUTURE MONTH TILL THE CASE ENDS: THAT’S WHAT THE DELHI HIGH COURT HELD IN “APNAGHAR BUILDERS PVT. LTD. VS. INTENSE FITNESS & SPA PVT. LTD.” FAQ IPR Consumer Forums Medical Negligence And many more Contact Practice Areas About IF A BANK OR NBFC FILES CASE AGAINST GUARANTOR FOR LOAN RECOVERY THEN THE GUARANTOR CAN SUE THE PRINCIPAL DEBTOR AND THE LATTER IS NOT ENTITLED TO HIS SECURITY UNDER IBC : THAT’S WHAT NCLAT HELD IN “SHREE KUMAR MUNDHRA VS. M/S SPELL ORGANICS LTD. & ORS.” ( PART-I) WHAT TO DO IF SOMEONE FILES A CASE AT A FARAWAY PLACE JUST TO HARASS YOU: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT EXPLAINED IN “CHITTARANJAN MUKHERJI VS BARHOO MAHTO” Senior Citizen Rights Writ Petitions WHAT TO DO IF YOUR SIBLING, EVEN AFTER TAKING HIS SHARE IN PARENT’S PROPERTY, DISHONESTLY DEMANDS ANOTHER PARTITION FROM YOUR SHARE? : THAT’S WHAT THE PATNA HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN “GIRIJA NANDAN SINGH AND ORS. VS GIRDHARI SINGH AND ORS.” IF A PERSON ILLEGALLY OCCUPIES YOUR PROPERTY, THEN HOW TO GET IT BACK AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE?: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT EXPLAINED IN GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI V. MEENAKSHI AYAL & ORS. EVEN IF YOU PURCHASE A PROPERTY UNDER THE INNOCENT BELIEF THAT SELLER IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, THOUGH HE IS NOT, YOU ARE ENTITLED TO GET THE PROPERTY BACK IF THE SELLER BECOMES OWNER AT A LATER DATE: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT HELD IN “JUMMA MASJID, MERCARA VS KODIMANIANDRA DEVIAH”(PART-II) IF A PURHCASER/AUCTION PURCHASER NEGLECTS TO VERIFY THE ANTECEDENTS OF THE PROPERTY, LIKE A PRIOR MORTGAGE, CHARGE OR TENANT LIVING IN THE PURCHASED PROPERTY, THEN HE HAVE TO PAY FOR THESE LIABILITIES OUT OF HIS OWN POCKET: THAT’S WHAT CALCUTTA HIGH COURT HELD IN “JNANENDRA NATH ROY V/S SHASHI MUKHI DEBYA” WHETHER TO APPROACH HIGH COURT OR NCLT, IF GOVERNMENT TAKES AN ADVERSE DECISION AGAINST YOU DURING INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT EXPLAINED IN ‘M/S EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD. V. STATE OF KARNATAKA” (PART-I) WHETHER TO APPROACH HIGH COURT OR NCLT, IF GOVERNMENT TAKES AN ADVERSE DECISION AGAINST YOU DURING INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT EXPLAINED IN “M/S EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD. V. STATE OF KARNATAKA” (PART-II) WHAT TO DO IF YOU FIND OUT THAT THE PROPERTY YOU PURCHASED WAS ALREADY MORTGAGED TO SOMEONE ELSE: THAT’S WHAT THE ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN “JUGUL KISHORE VS BANWARI LAL AND ORS.” WHAT TO DO IF BROTHER SAYS THAT YOUR PARENTS GAVE ALL THEIR PROPERTY TO HIM IN A WILL AND YOU ARE ENTITLED TO NOTHING?: THAT’S WHAT DELHI HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN AJIT GOGNA V. JITENDER GOGNA & ORS. IF A BANK OR NBFC FILES CASE AGAINST GUARANTOR FOR LOAN RECOVERY THEN THE GUARANTOR CAN SUE THE PRINCIPAL DEBTOR AND THE LATTER IS NOT ENTITLED TO HIS SECURITY UNDER IBC : THAT’S WHAT NCLAT HELD IN “SHREE KUMAR MUNDHRA VS. M/S SPELL ORGANICS LTD. & ORS.” (PART-II) Discussions Posts IF A BROTHER GETS HIGHER SHARE ON PARTITION OF HINDU JOINT FAMILY PROPERTY, HE MUST ALSO COMPENSATE HIS SIBLINGS FROM HIS SHARE TO EQUALIZE PARTITION: THAT’S WHAT MADRAS HIGH COURT HELD IN “MANICKAM PILLAI VS AUDINARAYANA PILLAI” Gallery About Team WHAT IS ARBITRATION AND CAN A PARTY BE FORCED INTO IT ? : THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT EXPLAINED IN INDO WIND ENERGY LIMITED V/S WESCARE INDIA LIMITED & ANR. (PART-I) Home HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF AGAINST UNREASONABLE AND EXCESSIVE DEMAND OF PROPERTY TAX BY MCD ? : THAT’S WHAT DELHI HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN “K. L. RATHEE V. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI” (PART-I) INCOME TAX AUTHORITIES CANNOT STOP YOU FROM WITHDRAWING MONEY FROM YOUR OWN BANK ACCOUNT: THAT’S WHAT MADRAS HIGH COURT HELD IN “K M ADAM VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER” CASE NO ONE CAN BE THROWN OUT OF HIS HOME ILLEGALLY:THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT HELD IN “STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. VERSUS THAKUR BHARAT SINGH” CASE: AVOIDING ARREST IN THE ABSENCE OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS A FORMER PARTNER CANNOT BE FORCED TO PAY FOR ILLEGAL ACTS OF EXISTING PARTNERS: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT HELD IN “M/S JUGGILAL KAMLAPAT V. M/S SEW CHAND BAGREE” TO GET AN INSURANCE CLAIM A PERSON CAN DIRECTLY APPROACH THE HIGH COURT: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT HELD IN “LIC VS. ASHA GOEL” IF A PERSON IS INDEBTED TO THE PERSON WHO MADE THE WILL, NEITHER HE CAN BE AN EXECUTOR IN PROBATE PROCEEDINGS NOR HE CAN BE GIVEN LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION: THAT’S WHAT BOMBAY HIGH COURT HELD IN “MANIRAM VERSUS SETH ROOPCHAND” EVEN IF YOU PURCHASE A PROPERTY UNDER THE INNOCENT BELIEF THAT SELLER IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, THOUGH HE IS NOT, YOU ARE ENTITLED TO GET THE PROPERTY BACK IF THE SELLER BECOMES OWNER AT A LATER DATE: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT HELD IN “JUMMA MASJID, MERCARA VS KODIMANIANDRA DEVIAH”(PART-I) YOU CAN PREVENT A PERSON FROM CONSTRUCTING HIS PROPERTY IN A MANNER WHICH DISTURBS YOU FROM ENJOYING YOUR PROPERTY FULLY: THAT’S WHAT THE SUPREME COURT HELD IN “HERO VINOTH (MINOR) VS SESHAMMAL” AN OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR IN LIQUIDATION PROCEEDINGS IS NOT ENTITLED TO ASK A DIRECTOR TO PAY THE DUES OF THE COMPANY FROM HIS PERSONAL INCOME : THAT’S WHAT BOMBAY HIGH COURT HELD IN “SHRI VIMALKUMAR RAVJI SHAH V/S THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND  ORGANISATION, SOLAPUR & ORS” IF A BANK DISHONOUR YOUR CHEQUE ILLEGALLY, YOU CAN ASK FOR COMPENSATION FROM THE BANK FOR ALL THE LOSSES WHICH YOU FACE BECAUSE OF SUCH DISHONOUR: THAT’S WHAT MADRAS HIGH COURT HELD IN “CANARA BANK VS I.V. RAJAGOPAL” LIC CANNOT DENY PAYMENT OF THE INSURANCE MONEY TO THE DEPENDANTS OF THE POLICY HOLDER ON TRIVIAL GROUNDS: THAT’S WHAT BOMBAY HIGH COURT HELD IN “SMT. DIPASHRI V. LIC” A DIRECTOR OR EMPLOYER CANNOT BE ARRESTED BY INCOME TAX OR EPFO AUTHORITIES ON THE SOLE GROUND THAT HE HAS NOT PAID PROVIDENT FUND OR INCOME TAX ARREARS: THAT’S WHAT THE KERALA HIGH COURT HELD IN “ALI VERSUS RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION”(PART-I) A DIRECTOR OR EMPLOYER CANNOT BE ARRESTED BY INCOME TAX OR EPFO AUTHORITIES ON THE SOLE GROUND THAT HE HAS NOT PAID PROVIDENT FUND OR INCOME TAX ARREARS: THAT’S WHAT THE KERALA HIGH COURT HELD IN “ALI VERSUS RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION”( PART-II)