uniquelylegal

HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF AGAINST UNREASONABLE AND EXCESSIVE DEMAND OF PROPERTY TAX BY MCD ? : THAT WHAT DELHI HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN “K. L. RATHEE V. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI” (PART-II)

The first remedy is that of Appeal which is provided under Section 169 of DMC Act which can be filed before Municipal Taxation Tribunal ( in short MTT). Here you can challenge the increase of your property tax by giving all the reasons which you think are required to be taken into account by MCD

HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF AGAINST UNREASONABLE AND EXCESSIVE DEMAND OF PROPERTY TAX BY MCD ? : THAT’S WHAT DELHI HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN “K. L. RATHEE V. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI” (PART-I)

Many a times it have been seen that there is an unreasonable demand of property tax by MCD authorities that too for a time period spanning 10 to 20 years. It makes the property tax a huge burden as it is nearly impossible to pay such a big amount that too within a short period of time.

WHAT TO DO IF YOUR SIBLING, EVEN AFTER TAKING HIS SHARE IN PARENT’S PROPERTY, DISHONESTLY DEMANDS ANOTHER PARTITION FROM YOUR SHARE? : THAT’S WHAT THE PATNA HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN “GIRIJA NANDAN SINGH AND ORS. VS GIRDHARI SINGH AND ORS.”

It often happens that the siblings in the family solve their disputes regarding paternal property themselves and without making any undue publicity of it. Further it makes sense to pay a stamp duty when you purchase a property from some stranger but when you are getting your father’s/mother’s property which was always yours, need to pay stamp duty is never felt.

WHETHER TO APPROACH HIGH COURT OR NCLT, IF GOVERNMENT TAKES AN ADVERSE DECISION AGAINST YOU DURING INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS: THAT’S WHAT SUPREME COURT EXPLAINED IN “M/S EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD. V. STATE OF KARNATAKA” (PART-II)

The difference is that while the Supreme Court under Article 32 can only decide the matters in which a party’s Fundamental Rights have been breached, the High Court have wider jurisdiction and it can also decide the matters in which an authority have given a decision against you which it did not have power to give.

HOW TO ATTACH PROPERTY OR BANK ACCOUNT OF THE OPPOSITE PARTY AND MAKE IT PAY YOU THE MONEY WHICH IS LEGALLY YOURS: THAT’S WHAT CALCUTTA HIGH COURT EXPLAINED IN GOBINDA CHANDRA PAL V/S DWARKA NATH PAL & ORS.

In the present article we are going to discuss about one such “future safeguarding” process which is called Attachment. It protects our future by binding the bank account, house or any other property so that the opposite party cannot run away.